https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:31251 n = 117) of whom had encountered at least one episode (median = 3, Interquartile range = 4) of funder interference in their research: 56% in Australasia, 33% in Europe, and 30% in North America. Censorship of research outputs was the most common form of interference. The wording or writing of reports and articles, as well as where, when and how findings were released were the areas in which influence was most often reported. Conclusions: Funder interference in addiction science appears to be common internationally. Strategies to increase transparency in the addiction science literature, including mandatory author declarations concerning the role of the funder, are necessary.]]> Wed 15 Dec 2021 16:07:09 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30317 Tue 31 Jul 2018 14:01:16 AEST ]]>